
Link to article:
The Affordable Care Act, aka ObamaCare, has caused many heads around the nation to turn swiftly. The health care debate has been in politics for many years and may seem to be extinguishing ever-so-slowly. However, it doesn’t take much for the fire to be ignited once again.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi speak following a meeting with U.S.President Barack Obama on congressional Republicans’ effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., January 4, 2017. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
In this opinion piece written by Martin Longman, the idea of Republicans accepting the Affordable Care Act in order to fulfill their desires is being explored. He makes it known that he is astonished when listening to conservatives talk about health care. He highlights Kevin Williamson from the National Review and his ideas of why Republicans should look to Europe for better health care systems. Longman makes it clear that the ACA provides Americans what they want, which is to have everyone covered by private insurances that can actively participate in the market, but to also limit mandates and regulations. In addition, Longman points out the fact that the ACA would be in favor of the Republicans if they had not demonized it. Obamacare was modeled on the health care laws in Massachusetts, which were enacted while Mitt Romney (a Republican) was serving as governor. Furthermore, these laws were based on a plan to oppose HillaryCare in 1993. So why would Republicans demonize and bash on a system that was initially suggested by them?

https://www.kff.org/health-reform/poll-finding/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-future-directions-for-the-aca-and-medicaid/
In addition to this article, I included this visual from a poll conducted in 2017 concerning how Americans feel about ACA. As presented, Americans are split between repealing the act and keeping it. More Americans want to wait until a replacement plan is proposed in order to repeal the act. However, there are still some Americans who want to repeal the act immediately and work out the replacement later.
As I read this article, I made many connections from how laws are proposed to elements proposed in the More in Common study. I though of the 2/3 votes needed in the House and Senate to approve the repealing of the bill. Furthermore, I began to think of the More in Common study we focused on. I tried to come up with an answer as to why Republicans would discredit something based on their previous actions. The only reason I could think of was because they want to contribute to the polarization of this country through political parties. Politicians are using this act to carry out their agendas in making one another look back, instead of working with each other and creating a solution since there may be a slight difference in views and the priority of health insurance.
“That suggests to me that the consensus on health care will soon move to the left. In a tug-a-war, things don’t remain contested when one side lets go of the rope.”
Martin Longman,
Web editor of washington monthly
I will have to agree with Longman’s astounded reaction when listening to conservatives and Republicans talk of health care systems in America. They want certain concepts, yet demonize the very concept that they want. This only furthers the confusion and the hypocritical tendencies politics may involve. Furthermore, I feel as though this debate intensifies the polarization of the country between different political parties since they cannot agree on one thing. One thing is for certain, it is very hypocritical that Republicans do not support the ACA, even though it was inspired by Republican health care systems established around the country. Although this continues, I feel as though the Republican party has put themselves in a position of immobility they cannot get themselves out of, which will then in turn only allow the Democrats to act in order to bring change.
Article: ObamaCare is looking better and better to republicans
Author: Martin Longman
Date of publication: February 21, 2019
Source: Washington Monthly




